<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>Digital Science</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.digital-science.com</provider_url><author_name>Phill Jones</author_name><author_url>https://www.digital-science.com/blog/author/phill-jones/</author_url><title>More Confusion: Do We All Agree on What Constitutes Authorship? - Digital Science</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="N5XQSVco8s"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.digital-science.com/blog/2015/08/more-confusion-do-we-all-agree-on-what-constitutes-authorship/"&gt;More Confusion: Do We All Agree on What Constitutes Authorship?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://www.digital-science.com/blog/2015/08/more-confusion-do-we-all-agree-on-what-constitutes-authorship/embed/#?secret=N5XQSVco8s" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;More Confusion: Do We All Agree on What Constitutes Authorship?&#x201D; &#x2014; Digital Science" data-secret="N5XQSVco8s" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script type="text/javascript"&gt;
/* &lt;![CDATA[ */
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
/* ]]&gt; */
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><description>As I was scrolling through Twitter this morning, I came across a tweet from fellow Scholarly Kitchen chef and distinctive eyeglasses wearer, Phil Davis, that pointed to an article in Inside Higher Ed (IHE) on the thorny issue of academic credit and authorship: Research reveals significant share of scholarly papers have &#x2018;guest&#x2019; or &#x2018;ghost&#x2019; authors [&hellip;]</description><thumbnail_url>https://www.digital-science.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/digital-science-social-logo-1.png</thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width>512</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height>512</thumbnail_height></oembed>
